Supreme Court Sources of Law

Supreme Court ‘skeptical’ of mail-in ballots that arrive

Supreme Court appears skeptical of laws counting mail-in ballots after Election Day

At the Supreme Court Monday, the conservative majority seemed ready to overturn laws in 29 states that allow mail-in votes to be counted after Election Day if they were postmarked by Election Day.

· 5h · on MSN

Supreme Court conservatives appear skeptical of mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day

· 1d

Supreme Court Appears Poised to Reject Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Law

· 1d

The Latest: Supreme Court Will Decide Whether States Can Keep Counting Late Mail Ballots

The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing arguments on Monday to decide whether states can continue to count late-arriving mail ballots — an election issue targeted by President Donald Trump.

· 10h

Behind the Supreme Court arguments on the mail-in ballots case

· 20h

Some state officials say shifting mail ballot deadline will complicate plans for November elections

· 1d

Supreme Court hearing dispute today over late-arriving mail ballots

Before the Supreme Court is Mississippi's law, which allows mail ballots that are received up to five days after the election to be counted as long as they were postmarked by Election Day.

· 1d

SCOTUS conservatives signal readiness on curbing late-arriving mail ballots

· 1d

How this U.S. Supreme Court case affects WA’s vote-by-mail

Supreme Court declines to review press freedom case

At issue was the 2017 arrest in Texas of a journalist who published news stories about a border agent's public suicide and a car crash.

WCMH Columbus on MSN

Gender-affirming law set for Ohio Supreme Court

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — The Supreme Court of Ohio is poised to hear oral arguments Tuesday in a case that will decide the fate of House Bill 68, also called the Saving Adolescents from Experimentation,

SCOTUSblog

How academic briefs shape Supreme Court decisions

Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions and oral arguments, to provide insights into the justices’ decision making and what we can expect from the court in the future.